Deuteronomy 22:21 chances are they shall reveal the damsel on home of this lady father’s residence
Judges 19:2 along with his concubine interracial cupid free app played the whore against your, and moved far from him unto her dad’s household to Bethlehemjudah, and had been truth be told there four whole period.
Jeremiah 3:12-14,22 Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Go Back, thou backsliding Israel, saith the LORD; and I don’t cause mine fury to fall upon your: for I’m merciful, saith god, and I won’t keep frustration for everaˆ¦
Jeremiah 4:1,14 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith the father, return unto me: while thou wilt store thine abominations from my view, then shalt thou perhaps not removeaˆ¦
Jeremiah 8:4-6 Moreover thou shalt state unto them, Thus saith the father
They say. –Better, as they say, as introducing an innovative new application of the figure. The immediate research will be Deuteronomy 24:4, which forbade the come back to yesteryear partner as an abomination, a legislation that your previous finding regarding the guide from the Law (2Kings 22:10-11) have most likely put into prominence. But there is however additionally an evident allusion for the want imagery in Hosea. There the prophet have accomplished, literally or even in parable, precisely what the legislation have forbidden (Hosea 2:16; Hosea 3:3), and so have presented from the possibility for return and the desire of pardon. Jeremiah has to perform a sterner role. and make the apostate adulteress no less than believe that she have sinned too profoundly for any claims to forgiveness. It may look as if Jehovah cannot now come back to the love of their espousals, making the woman exactly what she as soon as was in fact.
However come back once more for me, saith god. –The words noises when you look at the English like a gracious invite, and–in spite with the authority of several interpreters taking it an indignant exclamation, and return to me personally! an invite provided in paradox, and equivalent to getting rejected, like that return were out of the question–it must, In my opinion, become so taken. The prophet possess, as we have observed, the annals of Hosea in his mind, where there was indeed such a phone call to come back (Hosea 2:19; Hosea 3:3), and also refers to it and repeats they in Jeremiah 3:7; Jeremiah 3:12; Jeremiah 3:14. It really indicates a want of insight into the character of Jeremiah to guess that the guy previously arrived before boys as proclaiming an irrevocable condemnation, excluding the possibility of repentance.
Verse 1. – they state , etc.; just like the margin of Authorized type correctly states, the Hebrew merely keeps “claiming.” Various innovative attempts have been made to describe this. Hitzig, by way of example, accompanied by Dr. Payne Smith, thinks that “saying” might an unusual similar for “frankly,” “for example,” and/or similar; while the Vulgate and Rashi, with De Wette and RosenmA?ller, believe an ellipsis, and make, “it really is commonly said,” or “i would state.” But far more natural way is to guess that “saying” is a fragment of this superscription associated with prophecy, the remaining which is unintentionally positioned in ver. 6, which we ought to study, “and word of the Lord emerged unto me personally for the days of Josiah the king, saying.” Very J. D. Michaelis, Ewald, Graf, Naegelsbach. If men put away their girlfriend . The debate was established from the law of Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which forbade an Israelite who had divorced their partner to simply take their once again, if for the period she were hitched to some other. The Jews got broken a still more sacred wrap, not once best, but continually; they worshipped “gods lots of and lords lots of;” so they didn’t come with lengthier any declare on Jehovah in virtue of their “covenant” along with his people. Shall he come back , etc.? quite, Ought he to return? The energy with the name is actually possible (compensation. Authorized Version of Genesis 34:7, “which thing ought never to be achieved”). Shall perhaps not next clause is rather wouldn’t . Yet go back once again to me. Very Peshito, Targum, Vulgate, plus the see could seem to be confirmed because of the invitations in vers. 12, 14, 22. But as it’s demonstrably contradictory making use of the discussion of this verse, so that as the verb may equally well be the infinitive or perhaps the vital, newest commentators render, “And thinkest thou to go back in my opinion?” (literally, and returning to myself! implying that really tip try inconceivable). Probably Jeremiah had been aware most Jews happened to be disappointed making use of religious disease for the nation (comp. ver. 4).